One of the most important conventions in the
filtration industry: NOT ALL FILTERS ARE CREATED EQUAL. The pore size of
filter media is identified by the diameter of the particle that it can be
expected to retain with a defined, high degree of efficiency. Pore sizes are
usually stated in micrometer or microns for short (µm), which equals one
millionth of a meter. Pore size ratings refer to the size of a specific particle
or organism retained by the filter media to a specific degree of efficiency.
Ratings can be stated as either nominal or absolute pore size.
An
absolute pore size rating specifies the pore size at which a challenge
organism of a particular size will be retained with 100% efficiency under
strictly defined test conditions. Among the conditions that must be specified
are: test organism (or particle size), challenge pressure, concentration and
detection method used to identify the contaminant.
E.g. live bacteria test
Absolute micro-filters are used for critical
applications such as sterilizing and final filtration.
A
nominal pore size rating describes the ability of the filter media to retain
the majority of particulate at (60 - 98%) the rated pore size. Process
conditions such as operating pressure, concentration of contaminant, etc., have
a significant effect on the retention efficiency of the filters.
POU nominally rated carbon filters are used on
city water only (disinfected water) for general filtration such as particulate,
chlorine and it's byproducts, chemical, taste and odors.
Note: Rating parameters vary widely among
manufacturers and filtration industries.
A leading POU/POE (domestic devices) water
industry association defines "absolute" to mean 85% rejection at the stated
micron ratings and at the recommended flow rate. Some POU filter manufacturers
(aggressive marketers) using extruded and powdered activated carbon (CB and PAC)
claim 0.5 µm "absolute" ratings under this "standard".
In industrial filtration absolute rating provides
a much stricter efficiency standard for the filter, typically 98-99% percent
rejection rate at the stated micron. Some industrial filter manufacturers use
multi-pass standard (BETA ratio) efficiency method (the dirtier the more
efficient) which we are not going to get into it.
The high-purity water industry (pharmaceutical,
pre-treated RO feed water etc.) even defines absolute as a 99.99% efficiency
(4-log retaining efficiency) single pass rejection rate or greater as with
Doulton ceramic candles and cartridges (100% at 0.9 µm absolute). However,
independent validation might be in order for filter manufacturers making this
claim.
In layman's language terms what
exactly all these micron rating "standards" mean?
Let assume that one litre of untreated water
contains 50.000 particles the size of 3 µm. (the size of cryptosporidium cyst).
With a single pass @60/4 psi/bars pressure through the filter 1 L. of filtered
water can contain:
85% retaining efficiency, POU/POE standard
|
98-99% retaining efficiency, industrial
filtration standard
|
99.9% US EPA "purifier" guide standard
|
99.99 % retaining efficiency, high purity
filtration standard
|
99.9999 % efficiency, 6 log retaining
efficiency
|
7,500 particles
|
1000-500 particles
|
50 particles
|
5 particles
|
none
|
NOTE:In ultra-pure and industrial process water,
absolute rated organic media micro-filters are designed to operate at low water
pressures (about 25/1.7 psi/bars) rather than typical domestic pressure (60/4
psi/bars).
Filters mechanically retain particles through
debth or surface filtration principles. Doulton uses both principles.
How can a carbon block filter
("purifier") manufacturer claims to remove 99.99% virus and bacteria whilst only
99.9% cyst retention.
a) They are not removing viruses nor
bacteria, they are "poisoning" them with "food grade" pesticides or iodine or
it's byproducts incorporated into the filter media or, rely on some magnetic
"electro-attractive forces" retention.
b) The "poison" don't work well on cysts. Keep in mind that viruses and bacteria
are much smaller than cysts therefore easier to "poison".
|